Many years ago I had a good friend who was a student of many
things, and at the time had aspirations to be an artist (she has ended up a
professional photographer, so she knew what she was doing!). I appreciated what
she was doing very much but she was quite dismissive of the plastic hobby. To
her, kits were not art because the kit company had “done it all” for the
builder already. Building from scratch, sure, but kits? No way, she said. Not
art.
I tried explaining that if you give the same kit to ten
different modellers and ask them to produce it in the same scheme you’ll get
ten different results, whether down to skill in building, interpretations of
the material, or due to variations in techniques and the modeller’s “eye” for
the project – in other words, artistic input – but alas this argument fell on
deaf ears.
I have often wondered where the line falls on this question.
Where does it start, or stop, being art? To me, a model is a three-dimensional
canvas, a primed model is a blank sheet, ready for me to create upon it a
structure in paints and pigments which hopefully will convey the impression of
the real thing. What about earlier, during construction? Is it artistic to fill
and sand seams just so, is it artistic to assemble the parts to a high degree
of precision, or is that merely technical competence (as I heard an art
lecturer once dismiss the paintings of Canaletto)?
My personal feeling is that we are engineers while we are
building, and become artists the moment we pick up the airbrush. There are few
who would deny that it is an artistic pursuit when faced with the battery of
brushes, paints, mixing trays and so forth entailed in doing a complex job on, say,
fully weathered armour. And to deliver a sharp, precise paintjob on an
aircraft, weathered or otherwise, is at least as much an art as what the custom
car guys do, surely?
Okay, I’m biased, when I see a soft-edge camo job I both
respect the skill of the painter and delight in the sense of realism it
creates, perhaps as a result of still remembering the frustration of being a
junior modeller smearing thick paint onto models by brush and despairing of
ever making them look the way they did in magazines. Air painting changed all
that, and the skill is one that is never completely learned, there will always
be a new trick or technique to explore to refine the appearance of a model,
closer and closer to some impossible ideal.
Is this an artistic aspiration? I think it is, not simply a
desire to be a better engineer, a better technician, though it is those things
also. Unless entering contests, we are rarely in the comparative stakes with
our peers, and build thus very much for our selves, our satisfaction is all
about our own standards, and they are notoriously difficult to measure up to.
This is precisely the same mechanism for an artist working in 2D, so at that
level the distinction has blurred completely. One might say that a military
paint technician is not an artist because he is “colouring-in” a vehicle to a
specification given to him, and though he may do so to a high standard of
precision, there is no creativity in the process. We, however, then proceed to
paint on the dirt, dust, rust, chips and scratches that the vehicle accumulates
in the course of its duty, and these, while varying relatively predictably with
the environment, are a much more flexible suite of events than the vehicle’s
passage through the spray bay could ever be. Therein lies the art, I think,
making a visually pleasing interpretation of a set of physical laws and
effects.
Some might still quibble and say the physical laws we are
emulating reduce creativity to a negligible level, but consider the results of
a beginner and the long road he or she must trek to reach a level which his or
her own eye will accept as realistic – this is a process, a learning curve,
filled with successes and failures, frustrations and inspirations, highs and
lows. If nothing else, the emotional process and fascination with what we do
can easily be associated with artistic creativity (though, to be fair, a
hot-rodder also goes through most or all of the same phases while developing
the skills to turn out a masterpiece of automotive custom-engineering, which begs
the question, is that art too? It
might be!)
I doubt a question
like this actually has an answer, a bottom line, but it’s certainly fodder for
conjecture. I’ve seen models finished to the standard of fine art, but also
“art” which is an insult to the wall it’s daubed on, so who knows? I just know
that to me, the plastic kit hobby is an art form, and a very rewarding one
No comments:
Post a Comment