The last Airfix kit I built was four or five years ago,
their 1:72nd scale Lunar Module, a classic tool from about 1969,
tying in with the Moon program when it was happening. The quality was not great
by today’s standards and I struggled manfully with fiddly bits, trying to apply
a reasonable generic paintjob (the exact details were different on every LM)
and to wrap the legs and lower stage in gold foil for a realistic effect. The
end result was not bad but it was not an experience I’d want to repeat.
But since the 2008 collapse of Britain’s one-time
flag-carrier in the hobby, the company has been reincarnated under a new,
ambitious and highly competent management and technical team, and in many ways
Airfix has been reborn as a competitive company in the 21st century.
The firm is on its own 60th anniversary this year, and for those of
us who grew up with Airfix as far back as the 60s, it is nothing short of a
delight to see the brand resurge. They went through some teething troubles, to
be sure, but even before the crash they had shown they could deliver
competitive detail and fit, with their Spitfire Mk. 24 and Seafire FR. 47 kits
in 48th scale.
I have not really had a chance to build any of the new era
kits so far, though I have stockpiled over a dozen in my stash. So, just recently,
I took the opportunity to try my hand at one of the best-reviewed of their
new-tool 72s, their P-51 Mustang (#A01004), and I am more than a little
impressed. The level of detail I feel is pretty comparable to the big guys out
there, and while there is always going to be divided opinion over their
engraved panel lines, I feel they have reached a point of restraint at which
the effect is entirely acceptable. They could go a bit finer again, sure, but
they have come a long way. (About two years ago I was tempted to try their Sea
Harrier kit, and the yawning chasms put me off, I sold the kit on without
really getting started. Oddly, when I was younger, I did not really mind the
infamous engraved detail of the old Matchbox kits, but when it raises its head
in other contexts you can see how extreme it really is.)
The Mustang features cockpit detail, wheelwell detail,
convincing tread on the tires, choice of canopies (Inglewood or Dallas hoods),
gunsight glass, droptanks… There is little more you could ask for in this
scale. It’s not all roses, however, the instrument panel is a decal, not a
terribly convincing one, and the control stick is one of those tiny parts
attached by two sprue gates, which, though it may be necessary for moulding
reasons (even so, Hobby Boss can do it with one gate), is the kiss of death for
removing the part. Cut one gate, the part snaps due to torsion against the
other anchor point. I built the plane without a joystick – and the radio mast
went the same way for the same reason but I was able to scratch a new one from
stripstock.
Parts fit is excellent, with only a minor lick of filler
needed in a few places. The plastic reacts well with solvents, and accepts
paint beautifully.
I’ve had a yen to do a camouflaged Mustang for a long while,
so used AM decals (I’ve had a run of bad luck with kit decals this year and
feel drawn to AMs in general). I used Eagle Strike IP7204, 357th
Fighter Group Pt. 3, and did G4-C, mount of Captain Leonard Carson in November,
1944. The aircraft features RAF Dark Green over US Neutral Gray, one of those
planes painted not from US paint stocks but British supplies. I used Tamiya
XF-81 and MM Acryl 4757. The white ID bands were sprayed in XF-2 and masked,
then the airframe was pre-shaded in XF-69 and the main colours applied.
Microscale Satin was the clear coat used to seal the paint, then Florey washes
accented the engraved detail and were sealed with another coat of satin.
The decals were of mixed quality – they freed readily from
their backing and were beautifully printed, but had no intention of setting
into surface detail and Micro Sol was essentially ineffective. This was bad
news re the red and yellow checkers of the 357th’s nose band, and I
ended up cutting away the parts of the decals meant to wrap around the chin
intake and completing the pattern in paint. This is curious, as the sheet
instructions recommend and endorse Microscale chemistry, even reprinting the
well-known Microscale directions to the letter.
Final assembly and detail painting went smoothly enough,
though the landing gear was a problem. The scale-thickness of the landing legs
meant they were very fragile, and though the legs slot into keyed receivers the
outer bay doors did not slot equally into the wing lower surface, the net result
of which was a toed-in look. The gear units as a whole are acceptable, but when
you know a Mustang’s legs are vertical it does grate a bit. I know what to look
out for next time. After my usual round
of finishing techniques were applied, the model looked very nice on the shelf;
it was not a difficult build, indeed most of the issues I had were with the
decals, not the kit. In future I would do my best to paint the spinner cone
rather than wrap on a decal, though other brands may lie down more tightly –
this is also my first time using Eagle Strike decals, incidentally, and they
may call for a stronger setting solution. (Odd, once again, as Aeromaster,
which is the sister line and presumably shares identical manufacture specifics,
reacts well to Microscale chemistry…)
Will I repeat this process? Well, I ordered up two more
Airfix Mustangs before I was finished this one, and I can see me adding one or
two to each year’s build list. (I used Eduard etched harness on this one but I might skip that in future, or at least I'll need to be mentally ready to tackle that aspect, as working with etch at 1:72nd scale, and having it come out looking decent, is no mean feat!)
At last, an inexpensive but well-detailed kit
(if not quite an A+ on its report
card), nicely accurate and easy to build, that will serve as the basis for so
many of those decals that have been filed away for years! I can see a large
part of my 1:72nd scale Mustang fleet being Airfix in origin,
something I would not have expected in years gone by. Highly recommended!
No comments:
Post a Comment